Welcome, Dr. Demo
This is your personal CLINiQA page to inspect your interview quality in the cohort.
Demonstration prototype - All quality scores displayed are computed using provisional rule-based algorithms and do not reflect validated clinical assessments. The data is synthetic, the scoring thresholds are arbitrary, and the visualisations may contain inaccuracies. This platform is a proof of concept illustrating the project's objectives. Significant research work remains: annotated corpus collection, model training, threshold calibration, and clinical validation.
Interviews
—
Global Quality Index
—
Protocol Adherence
—
Neutrality
—
Probing
—
Communication
—
Global Quality Index distribution
Excellent
Acceptable
Concerning
Inadequate
Classification rules (demonstration thresholds): Global Quality Index = 35% Protocol Adherence + 25% Neutrality + 25% Probing + 15% Communication. An interview is classified as inadequate if any dimension < 0.45, concerning if any dimension < 0.65, otherwise by GQI: excellent (≥0.85), acceptable (≥0.65), concerning (≥0.45), inadequate (<0.45). These thresholds are provisional and will be calibrated with annotated real-world data.
Interviews
| ID | Type | Date | Duration | Global Quality | Adherence | Neutrality | Probing | Communication | Level |
|---|